Skip to content
Glass & Ridge

Monoculars

Monocular vs Binoculars

Binoculars are better to look through. A monocular is a third of the bulk. Here is exactly what each side of that trade costs you.

By Mike M.Published How we review

We earn a commission if you buy through the links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It never changes which products we pick or how we rank them - read the full disclosure.

Vortex Diamondback HD 8x42 hunting optic

Our top pick

Vortex Diamondback HD 8x42

A 5.25 mm exit pupil and 17 mm of eye relief at the $250 tier, which is the combination most first upgrades actually need.

$239.00 on Amazon

Price as of October 5, 2026. #ad How we earn

This comparison is unusually clean, because Vortex publishes the same 393 ft field of view for the Solo R/T 8x36 monocular and the Diamondback HD 8x42 binocular (both verified 2026-10-05). The field is identical, so everything that differs is about one eye against two.

What you lose with one eye

Low-contrast resolution. This is the big one and it is physiological rather than optical. Your visual system combines the two slightly different images from your eyes, and that combination is genuinely better at pulling a shape out of a cluttered background than either image alone. A bedded gray-brown animal in gray-brown sage is precisely a low-contrast problem, and two eyes solve it measurably better.

Endurance. Glassing through one eye is more tiring, partly because you are suppressing the other eye's input and partly because you tend to squint. Over an hour the difference is real, and tired eyes find less.

Depth perception. Minor for most hunting. It matters when you are judging whether an animal is in front of or behind a line of brush, which affects whether you have a shot.

What you gain

The same 8x format, monocular against binocular
Solo R/T 8x36Diamondback HD 8x42
Computed exit pupil4.50 mm5.25 mm
Published field at 1,000 yd393 ft393 ft
Published eye relief18.0 mm17 mm
BulkAbout a thirdReference
ViewingOne eyeTwo eyes
Rough price$149$239
Ranging reticleYesNo

Both sets of published figures read from Vortex on 2026-10-05. The monocular is cheaper, smaller, and has more eye relief. The binocular has more exit pupil and two eyes.

The bulk saving is the whole case, and it is bigger than the specification suggests because it changes behavior: a monocular lives in a harness pocket and gets used reflexively, while a binocular is a decision to carry.

The three cases where the monocular wins

  1. As a second optic. Not instead of binoculars - as well as. A few ounces in a pocket for quick checks, with the binoculars doing the real glassing.
  2. One-handed use. Holding a bow, holding a rifle, bracing on a tree. A monocular comes up one-handed with less motion.
  3. Thermal. The sensor is the product and a second channel would roughly double the cost for nothing. Thermal picks.

And the one case that is a mistake

Buying a monocular as your only glassing optic to save money or weight. The $90 saved and the few ounces are not worth the loss in low-contrast resolution and endurance, because those are exactly what finding animals depends on. If budget is the constraint, a $149 Crossfire HD binocular beats a $149 monocular for that job. Budget binoculars.

The two side by side

1The binocular8.4/10
Vortex Diamondback HD 8x42 hunting optic
$239.00 on Amazon

Price as of October 5, 2026. #ad How we earn

Vortex Diamondback HD 8x42

A 5.25 mm exit pupil and 17 mm of eye relief at the $250 tier, which is the combination most first upgrades actually need.

Published specifications for the Vortex Diamondback HD 8x42
Magnification8x
Objective lens42 mm
Eye relief17 mm
Field of view393 feet/1000 yards
Angular field of view7.5 degrees
Close focus5 feet
Weight21.8 oz
Height5.8 inches
Width5.1 inches
Exit pupil (computed)5.25 mm
Twilight factor (computed)18.3

Specs verified 2026-10-05 from Vortex's published specification. Exit pupil and twilight factor are computed, not quoted.

What it does well

  • 5.25 mm exit pupil, the same figure as the Viper HD 8x42
  • 17 mm eye relief works with glasses
  • 393 ft field of view is wide for the money

Where it gives ground

  • 8x limits you in genuinely open country
  • Focus wheel is stiffer than the Viper's in the cold

Skip it if

You glass across canyons - the extra magnification matters more than the brightness there.

How this score breaks down
  • Low-light performance (weight 4)8.5
  • Size and weight (weight 4)6.0
  • Optical quality per dollar (weight 4)9.5
  • Eye relief (weight 2)9.0
  • Build and sealing (weight 2)10.0

Weights and definitions are published on how we review. These are editorial judgments from published specs and documented consensus, not test results.

Vortex publishes 393 ft of field and 17 mm of eye relief (verified 2026-10-05). Better on every optical count than any monocular here.

2The monocular8.6/10
Vortex Solo R/T 8x36 hunting optic
$149.00 on Amazon

Price as of October 5, 2026. #ad How we earn

Vortex Solo R/T 8x36

A 4.5 mm exit pupil, 18 mm of eye relief and an MRAD ranging reticle in a unit that weighs a third of a binocular.

Published specifications for the Vortex Solo R/T 8x36
Magnification8x
Objective lens36 mm
Eye relief18.0mm
Field of view393' @ 1000 yds
Angular field of view7.5º
Close focus16.4'
Weight9.7 oz.
Length4.9"
Exit pupil (computed)4.5 mm
Twilight factor (computed)17

Specs verified 2026-10-05 from Vortex's published specification. Exit pupil and twilight factor are computed, not quoted.

What it does well

  • R/T ranging reticle estimates distance without batteries
  • 18.0 mm eye relief, verified in Vortex's published specs
  • Half the bulk of binoculars

Where it gives ground

  • One eye tires faster than two over a long sit
  • No depth perception, which matters in cover

Skip it if

You glass for more than a few minutes at a time.

How this score breaks down
  • Low-light performance (weight 4)7.5
  • Size and weight (weight 4)8.5
  • Optical quality per dollar (weight 4)9.0
  • Eye relief (weight 2)9.5
  • Build and sealing (weight 2)9.0

Weights and definitions are published on how we review. These are editorial judgments from published specs and documented consensus, not test results.

Vortex publishes the same 393 ft of field and 18.0 mm of eye relief (verified 2026-10-05) - which makes this an unusually clean comparison, because the field of view is identical.

Questions people actually ask

Are binoculars better than a monocular for hunting?
For glassing, clearly yes - two eyes resolve low-contrast shapes better and tire more slowly. A monocular wins on bulk, on one-handed use, and as a pocketable second optic.
Can I use a monocular instead of binoculars to save weight?
You can, and you will find fewer animals. The weight saving is a few ounces; the cost is the low-contrast resolution that finding bedded animals depends on.
Why do monoculars have a smaller exit pupil?
They do not inherently - it is that monoculars are usually built with smaller objectives to stay compact. A 10x25 gives 2.5 mm; a 10x42 monocular gives the same 4.2 mm as a 10x42 binocular.
Is a monocular good as a backup optic?
Yes, and that is its strongest use. A few ounces in a harness pocket that you forget is there until your binoculars fog, get dropped, or are in the pack.

Sources